Posted to Emissions Forum on 12/28/2012
Re: Conflictling info ... WWYD?
I agree, John. My VIR shows this.
I guess that my original point is that conflicting reference
materials (among other things), can have a detrimental
effect on the repeatability of a test. This example isn't
quite ideal, because the overall result was "fail", all
three times. It would be more difficult to find an example
with a mixture of passes and fails in a short amount of
time, but my point remains.
If a test result is not repeatable, how can it logically be
used to evaluate inspection performance? My FuPR is 0.00,
the October tech's FuPR is 0.39, and the September tech's
FuPR is not publicly available, as should be for ALL techs
Quick Stop Smog & More
Sacramento, California, USA