Re: More STAR Observations
Posted to Emissions Forum on 8/13/2012
7 Replies
It occurs to me that some of you reading my previous post
might be thinking, "Why should you care? Just do your job
properly and it will all take care of itself."
Well, I submit to you that it WILL NOT take care of itself,
because I have been properly performing my duties as a
licensed technician for eleven years, and I can't do my job
any more properly than I already am as a member of the human
race.
http://www.smogcheck.ca.gov/pubwebquery/star/tech.aspx?tech=144107
Once again, I invite you to browse my short-term measures;
go back all the way to the beginning of last year. I
'Test-as-received' or reject; I do not turn away
max-incompletes or incomplete repairs out of fear from some
ridiculous metric. The vehicle passes my fair, objective
test, or it fails my fair, objective test, via my logical
interpretation of the hazy rules laid down in SCIP and SCRG.
That is how it should be for an inspector, and that is
exactly from where my intense anger comes with regards to
the FuPR, since it is CLEARLY not measuring my performance
as an inspector, but the future performance of the vehicle
that I inspected, and it is simply ludicrous for ANYONE to
claim that they are the same thing.
As I stated before, with the exception of my distracted
undercover incident, I have NEVER come even close to failing
any test related to my chosen profession, until my .00 FuPR
came out in all of its glory for the world to see. I do not
take insults lightly, and an illogical insult of this
magnitude demands a logical response of similar magnitude.
Sincerely,
Michael Barry Technician Quick Stop Smog & More Sacramento, California, USA
7 Replies Received
(View Replies)
7 Replies Received
(Hide Replies)
|