Re: RESPONCE TO LOW FPR SCORES
Posted to Emissions Forum on 6/9/2012
6 Replies
Amen, Kelly!
Danny told me that I stole your 'longest PDF' trophy with my
post last week, but I didn't do it on purpose! I just
couldn't help myself!
Heriberto makes many logical points, as do you. I believe
that my situation more closely matches yours; I'm not the
boss of my shop. I have little-to-no control over the flow
of repair orders coming through my bay, and the worn-out,
improperly-maintained, shoe-string-budget clunkers
associated with them. I could (and do from time to time)
refuse to work on or inspect the worst of the worst, but
that has risks of which you are no doubt aware. These risks
have taken on a new significance this year, since I am
CLEARLY unemployable at ANY self-respecting shop, should I
suddenly find myself hunting for work in my chosen
profession.
That being said, I don't have any serious problems with my
boss. He is a business man, and turning customers away (even
most of the crappy ones) is bad business, especially in
these hard times. I don't have access to his books, but I am
100% sure that my shop has teetered on the brink several
times in the last few years; I can see it in his face and
his attitude.
So, aside from feeling sorry for myself, what do I have a
serious problem with? You eloquently stated most of it in
the last part of your post, so I won't repeat that here.
What I would like to add is a paragraph from page 9 of my
PDF, and I will paste it here so you don't have to look it
up again:
As an aside, is the FPR scoring formula a linear function
directly based on the pass/(pass+fail) ratio of the future
performances of vehicles passed by a given inspector? If it
is, does that mean that to receive an FPR score of ZERO,
less than 1% of the vehicles that I passed were able to pass
a future inspection? Even when I consider the frequency of
the occurrences of scenarios similar to the above, I become
puzzled; there must be an undisclosed variable, harsh
non-linearity or discontinuity in the FPR scoring function.
Otherwise, my score would most certainly be non-zero.
I pride myself in being a logical person (Mr. Spock from the
original Star Trek was a hero and role model during my
formative years). I know my inspection situation better than
anyone else on this planet, and I can state unequivocally
that it is NOT logically possible for me to have a score of
ZERO, based on the publicly available information provided
by STAR. If this is correct, then the only logical
conclusion I can see is that there is a "ZERO this scumbag
out" button at STAR, and somebody clicked on it, not because
my REAL FPR was semi-crappy (which I would sadly
acknowlege), but because they saw something in my records
that they didn't like!
So, I agree with you and Heriberto on the reasons that an
FPR score can be low and how it can be improved. What pushed
my anger past it's limit was the ZERO! I know that from a
STAR application standpoint, ZERO and .39 aren't much
different, but they are quite different to me! A .39 would
tell me "You can do it, just be a little bit more hard-assed
when that used car dealer or C.R.A.P. program customer comes
around wth a D- specimen". A ZERO tells me "You are an
incompetent, dishonest piece of s**t. Don't even waste
everyone's time by trying to improve, because you obviously
don't know how to properly inspect a vehicle". If the FPR
scoring algorithm was a real person, I would have knocked
him straight the f**k out for that!
But, since the FPR scoring algorithm isn't a real person,
just God's gift to statistics directly based on a faulty
premise, I will have to purSUE other less violent methods,
in an attempt to get to the bottom of this ridiculous hole
in which I find myself. Who knows, maybe I'll find a magic
lamp down here ...
More later,
Michael Barry
Technician
Quick Stop Smog & More
Sacramento, California, USA